Prediction of Nathalie Herreman vs Joanne Odonohue Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Herreman vs J. Odonohue

Nathalie Herreman

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Joanne Odonohue

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Herreman 1 - 0 Odonohue

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathalie Herreman winning 2 and Joanne Odonohue winning 0. The last match between Nathalie Herreman and Joanne Odonohue was at the Newcastle Satellite, 18-10-1982, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Nathalie Herreman getting the victory 6-2 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Herreman	1
Odonohue	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Newcastle Satellite(10-18-82)

Stats

Nathalie Herreman

Joanne Odonohue

N. Herreman vs J. Odonohue H2H Profile

N. Herreman	Stats	J. Odonohue
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
51.41% (256-242)	Career Total W/L	40.00% (4-6)
1	Grass	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Herreman vs J. Odonohue Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nathalie Herreman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Joanne Odonohue has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nathalie Herreman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Joanne Odonohue has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nathalie Herreman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Joanne Odonohue has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nathalie Herreman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Joanne Odonohue winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nathalie Herreman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 82/73), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 13/15). Joanne Odonohue has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 4/5), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Nathalie Herreman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Joanne Odonohue has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nathalie Herreman winning 1 times and Joanne Odonohue being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathalie Herreman winning 2 and Joanne Odonohue winning 0.
The last match between Nathalie Herreman and Joanne Odonohue was at the Newcastle Satellite, 18-10-1982, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Nathalie Herreman getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nathalie Herreman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Joanne Odonohue has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nathalie Herreman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Joanne Odonohue has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nathalie Herreman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Joanne Odonohue has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nathalie Herreman vs Joanne Odonohue Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Herreman vs J. Odonohue H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Herreman	Stats	J. Odonohue
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Herreman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Cergy Pontois - 04-12-1995
Q1 Ines HeiseI. Heise	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
ITF Sao Paulo 1 - 06-11-1995
R3 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
ITF Lakeland - 23-10-1995
Q1 Stephanie HalsellS. Halsell	L	7-6(5) 3-6 6-4	Stats
ITF Fort Lauderdale - 16-10-1995
R3 Lihini WeerasuriyaL. Weerasuriya	W	4-6 6-4 6-4	Stats
R4 Daphne Van De ZandeD. Van	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Odonohue Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Goldair Satellite - 25-10-1982
Q2 Gaby EuG. Eu	W	6-0 7-5	Stats
Q3 Debbie ChestertonD. Chesterton	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
R3 Linda CassellL. Cassell	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Newcastle Satellite - 18-10-1982
Q2 Maria GoussetisM. Goussetis	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
R4 Nathalie HerremanN. Herreman	L	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Herreman vs J. Odonohue Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Herreman	Stats	J. Odonohue
51.41% (256/242)	YTD Win/Loss	40.00% (4/6)
51.67% (587/549)	Sets Win/Loss	36.36% (8/14)
50.22% (5194/5149)	Games Win/Loss	44.39% (87/109)
52.90% (82/73)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
50.00% (70/70)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
56.67% (51/39)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
46.43% (13/15)	Grass Win/Loss	44.44% (4/5)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
346.88	Average Opponent Rank	262.8
38.89% (7/11)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
56.25% (27/21)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (4/4)
46.99% (39/44)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
52% (256/495)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (4/10)
53% (16/30)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
48% (68/143)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (2/2)
84% (266/223)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
15% (266/41)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (2/0)
14% (232/33)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (8/2)